Creation Science
One frustrating aspect in researching
this website was to have many 'Google' internet searches
return mostly pages created by 'Creation Science' or 'Intelligent
Design' proponents. Although Darwinism has triumphed over religious
explanations and has been adopted by most religious groups the struggle
has been a long one and is not complete (See
Darwin's Legacy). The major
remaining group is well financed, and politically active.
This group, composed primarily of American
fundamentalists, seems to be deeply threatened by Darwin's Dangerous
Idea. Christian fundamentalists believe in the literal truth of the
bible. This is not a belief based on scientific evidence rather it is
based on faith: faith that the bible is the word of God. The bible says (as I
remember) that the stars were created on one day, creatures on another
and man on another day, all in the same week. Their best scholars
estimate that this week of creation occurred sometime in the last five
or six thousand years. Some in this group ignore the scientific
challenge to their beliefs and prefer to base their beliefs on faith
rather than evidence.
Others, those in the Creation Science
camp, attempt to find and interpret evidence supporting the
biblical story. These are the guys that are always finding evidence for
Noah's Ark on Mt Ararat and the like. Creation Science for a while
mounted a threat to the teaching of evolution in US science classrooms
but this largely ended with the 1987 supreme court ruling that teaching
Creation Science violated the separation of state and religion.
The latest attempt at muddying the waters
of evolution calls itself 'Intelligent Design'. It isn't a theory of
design and to get around the courts they don't mention God. Rather they
argue that Darwinian processes can't explain all design found in the
natural world and that in fairness other explanations should be taught
as well in science classes. All examples of biological complexity they
have put forward are only unexplainable by them, the scientific
community is quite unanimous that Darwinian explanations apply to them
quite nicely.
This does not slow them down. They demand
'freedom of ideas' and that 'both sides' be taught, as if scientific
truths are only beliefs or opinions. Elected school boards in Ohio have
bought their hogwash and many portions of the Grade 10 science
curriculum are lifted from the Intelligent Design handbook.
Outside of the Ohio classrooms are
cornfields producing the highest yields in the world. These are
genetically modified cornfields. The abundant wealth produced by Ohio
corn is due to a thorough understanding of the science of biology, on
truths only understandable in a Darwinian context. It seems they want it
both ways; wealth produced by science and comforting beliefs from the
bible.